When a pending task becomes a completion claim.
Illustrative example
This is an authored demonstration using fictional, non-patient information. The candidate response was deliberately written to illustrate a discrepancy. No model was tested or scored.
- Type
- Authored demonstration
- Task
- Documentation source fidelity
Source excerpt
Follow-up status: pending
Authored candidate response
Follow-up completed
Annotated finding
Unsupported completion claim
The candidate response changes the status from pending to completed. The supplied source does not support that change.
A review should preserve the distinction between a planned or pending action and a documented completed action.
Suggested correction
Follow-up remains pending.
How this review is documented
Compare the response with the supplied source, identify the unsupported statement, record the evidence, and suggest wording that preserves the source meaning.
Limitations
This single authored illustration demonstrates a reporting format. It does not establish error frequency, clinical severity, reviewer agreement or model performance. A real assignment requires agreed sources, criteria and retained response records.